Laparoscopic vs conventional midline approach for dog spays and post-op activity
At the second vaccination appointment for a young puppy, “Sasha”, you have a discussion with her owner, Mrs Brown, about the advantages and disadvantages of spaying when Sasha is old enough. Mrs Brown wants you to describe the procedure to her and seems disappointed when you explain your standard practice protocol of a midline incision with ovariohysterectomy. On further discussion you learn that her neighbour’s dog was spayed at a nearby practice offering laparoscopic spays. Mrs Brown was under the impression that all practices were doing this now and she believes that because the procedure is “key hole” the dogs are up and about and more active afterwards. You reassure her of the approach you normally take and of the practice protocols for post-operative monitoring. She seems happy with your response, but you begin to wonder if a laparascopic technique would make a difference to your patients post-operatively…
3-Part Question (PICO)
In [bitches undergoing neutering] does [laparascopic ovariectomy compared to conventional ovariectomy] increase [post-operative activity levels]?
Search Strategy and Summary of Evidence
MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and MEDLINE(R) 1946 to Present using the OVID interface
dog.mp. OR dogs.mp. OR exp dogs/ OR canine.mp. OR canines.mp. OR canis.mp. OR bitch.mp. OR bitches.mp.
spay.mp. OR spayed.mp. OR spays.mp. OR spey.mp. OR speyed.mp. OR speys.mp. OR neuter.mp. OR neutered.mp. OR ovariohysterectomy.mp. OR OVH.mp. OR ovario-hysterectomy.mp. OR ovariectomy.mp. OR exp Ovariectomy/ OR bitch spay.mp. OR bitch spays.mp.
laparoscopic ovariectomy.mp. OR laparoscopic.mp. OR laparoscopy.mp. OR exp Laparoscopy/ OR keyhole.mp. OR key hole.mp.
CAB Abstracts 1910 to Present using the OVID interface
dog.mp. OR dogs.mp. OR exp dogs/ OR canine.mp. OR canines.mp. OR canis.mp. OR bitch.mp. OR bitches.mp. OR exp Bitches/
spay.mp. OR spays.mp. OR spayed.mp. OR spey.mp. OR speys.mp. OR speyed.mp. OR neuter.mp. OR neutered.mp. OR ovariohysterectomy.mp. OR ovario-hysterectomy.mp. OR OVH.mp. OR ovariectomy.mp. OR exp Ovariectomy/ OR bitch spay.mp. OR bitch spays.mp.
laparoscopic ovariectomy.mp. OR laparoscopic.mp. OR laparoscopy.mp. OR exp laparoscopy/ OR keyhole.mp. OR key hole.mp.
- 94 papers found in MEDLINE search
- 91 papers excluded as they don't meet the PICO question
- 1 papers excluded as they are in a foreign language
- 1 papers excluded as they are review articles/in vitro research/conference proceedings
- 1 total relevant papers from MEDLINE
- 202 papers found in CAB search
- 191 papers excluded as they don't meet the PICO question
- 4 papers excluded as they are in a foreign language
- 6 papers excluded as they are review articles/in vitro research/conference proceedings
- 1 total relevant papers from CAB
Total relevant papers1 relevant papers from both MEDLINE and CAB Abstracts
Summary of Evidence
Culp et al. (2009) USA
The Effect of Laparoscopic Versus Open Ovariectomy on Postsurgical Activity in Small Dogs
20 intact female dogs weighing less than 10 kg, acquired through an animal welfare society, split into two groups: Laparoscopic ovariectomy (LapOVE) and open ovariectomy (OOVE)
Randomised Controlled Trial
- Median incision lengths in the LapOVE group were shorter than in the OOVE group - 4.2mm (range 3.8-5.6mm) and 9mm (range 7.2-11.3mm) for LapOVE compared to 52mm (range 45-58mm) for OOVE
- Median surgical time significantly shorter in OOVE group compared to LapOVE group (P=0.005)
- Median activity count changes from pre-surgical to post-surgical showed no significant change in the LapOVE group (no P value given)
- Median activity count changes from pre-surgical to post-surgical for the OOVE group showed a significant post-surgery activity decrease at Day 1 (P=0.002) and Day 2 (P=0.002)
- Total activity counts decreased by 25% after surgery in the LapOVE group (95% Confidence Interval 11-38%) and by 62% in the OOVE group (95% Confidence Interval 48-76%)
- P values not quoted for all results
- Only small breed < 10 kg dogs involved
- Activity levels post-surgery were compared for each dog to their own pre-surgery activity levels. While this allows each dog to be their own "control", the dogs were housed in a new environment and may not have had "normal" activity levels during the pre-surgery time.
- Although a greater total decrease in activity is seen in the OOVE group, no direct comparison in total activity counts with the LapOVE group is made.
- It is not definitively established whether more or less activity post-operatively indicates better analgesia, and this may vary between individuals. Therefore the clinical implications of this result should be interpreted with caution.
Post-surgery analgesia protocol of two injections of buprenorphine may not accurately reflect analgesia protocols in standard veterinary practice.
The BETs on this website are a summary of the evidence found on a topic and are not clinical guidelines. It is the responsibility of the individual veterinary surgeon to ensure appropriate decisions are made based on the specific circumstances of patients under their care, taking into account other factors such as local licensing regulations. Read small print
Culp WT, Mayhew PD, Brown DC, (2009). The Effect of Laparoscopic Versus Open Ovariectomy on Postsurgical Activity in Small Dogs. Veterinary Surgery 38: 811-17.
About this BET
A BET is a simple method of searching for and appraising evidence around a very specific clinical situation.
BETs don’t tell you what to do, they tell you about the evidence on a certain topic.
Not a Vet?
This website has been designed to help vets use the best, most relevant, up to date science when they make decisions about their patients.